Summary of "Last Look" at the RADIUS Design Guidelines document
"Bernard Aboba" <bernard_aboba@hotmail.com> Thu, 28 January 2010 18:02 UTC
Return-Path: <owner-radiusext@ops.ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-radext-archive-IeZ9sae2@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-radext-archive-IeZ9sae2@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F5893A6A7A for <ietfarch-radext-archive-IeZ9sae2@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 10:02:44 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.531
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.531 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.208, BAYES_20=-0.74, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6ekg33RK6Hbv for <ietfarch-radext-archive-IeZ9sae2@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 10:02:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from psg.com (psg.com [147.28.0.62]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B064E3A6915 for <radext-archive-IeZ9sae2@lists.ietf.org>; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 10:02:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from majordom by psg.com with local (Exim 4.71 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <owner-radiusext@ops.ietf.org>) id 1NaYWk-0007iG-7W for radiusext-data0@psg.com; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 17:51:34 +0000
Received: from [65.55.116.18] (helo=blu0-omc1-s7.blu0.hotmail.com) by psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.71 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <bernard_aboba@hotmail.com>) id 1NaYWf-0007ha-Og for radiusext@ops.ietf.org; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 17:51:29 +0000
Received: from BLU137-DS3 ([65.55.116.7]) by blu0-omc1-s7.blu0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Thu, 28 Jan 2010 09:51:29 -0800
X-Originating-IP: [24.19.160.219]
X-Originating-Email: [bernard_aboba@hotmail.com]
Message-ID: <BLU137-DS3E38CFB54B506CBB1A325935C0@phx.gbl>
From: Bernard Aboba <bernard_aboba@hotmail.com>
To: radiusext@ops.ietf.org
Subject: Summary of "Last Look" at the RADIUS Design Guidelines document
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 09:52:56 -0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0050_01CA9FFF.AB27CE70"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0
Thread-Index: AcqgQrkLTpCmmfYGSD2TeI9JJnggPQ==
Content-Language: en-us
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 28 Jan 2010 17:51:29.0200 (UTC) FILETIME=[84EEAB00:01CAA042]
Sender: owner-radiusext@ops.ietf.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <radiusext.ops.ietf.org>
On December 4, 2009, a "Last Look" at the RADIUS Design Guidelines document was announced: http://ops.ietf.org/lists/radiusext/2009/msg00661.html While the "last look" was to have concluded on December 18, 2009, vigorous discussion continued well into January 2010. This message represents a summary of the "last look", and a proposal for how to move forward. First of all, examination of the "Last Look" discussion indicates that the document as it stands does not represent RADEXT WG consensus and therefore will require changes. The major areas of concern include: 1. Treatment of complex attributes. These concerns were raised in Issue 325 and relate to Section 2.1.3 and portions of Appendix A. Proposals to move forward are included in the following messages sent to the list: a. http://ops.ietf.org/lists/radiusext/2010/msg00038.html b. http://ops.ietf.org/lists/radiusext/2010/msg00080.html c. http://ops.ietf.org/lists/radiusext/2010/msg00107.html 2. Applicability. These concerns have been raised in Issue 327, and relate to multiple sections in the document. Suggestions on how to move forward have been made by Dan Romascanu in the following message: http://ops.ietf.org/lists/radiusext/2010/msg00075.html It is our hope that discussions on the mailing list will result in proposed text addressing the concerns within the next week. In order to provide a venue for additional discussion, we will be posting a Doodle poll to determine times for a RADEXT Virtual Interim meeting.
- Summary of "Last Look" at the RADIUS Design Guide… Bernard Aboba